|
The Moly-White Pigments Group maintains a state of
the art accelerated testing laboratory for research
and development projects. Salt-spray, humidity, QUV
and cyclic salt-spray testing is provided as a
service to formulators evaluating Moly-White®
corrosion inhibitors. Although conventional
salt-spray tests (e.g., ASTM B117) are very widely
used in the coatings industry, it has long been
noted that correlation of salt-spray data with
outdoor exposure results can be quite poor.
The Moly-White Pigments Group has taken a pioneering
role in the development and promotion of more
reliable test methods for corrosion resistant
coatings.
Improved Test Methods
Test Methods based on altering exposure to cyclic
salt-spray (e.g. 'Prohesion') and UV-condensation
(e.g., QUV) have been shown to offer the best
available correlation with outdoor exposure testing
due to increasing industry interest, these cyclic
methods were recently adopted as an ASTM standard
under the designation ASTM D5894, "Cyclic
Salt-Fog/UV Exposure of Painted Metal".
Typical test conditions are outlined in
Table 1.
Cyclic salt-fog/UV exposure tests are believed to
offer better correlation with outdoor results due to
the incorporation of:
- a more appropriate choice of electrolyte
(composition and concentration)
- UV and condensation induced degradation
- periodic cycling of test conditions,
including temperature and wet/dry cycles
The superior 'real-world' correlation of cyclic
salt-fog/UV exposure tests versus conventional
salt-spray tests was very dramatically demonstrated
in two recent industry studies on accelerated test
methods. As outlined in
Table 2. cyclic salt-fog/UV exposure
tests were found to offer tremendously improved
correlation with field data versus the use of
conventional salt-spray and other new methods that
have been suggested to the coatings industry.
|
Table 1
ASTM D5894 Cyclic Salt-Fog/UV-Exposure Test
Procedure |
| Typical Test
Cycle [1 cycle = 336 hrs (2 weeks)]
|
- 168 hrs Cyclic
UV/Condensation (e.g. 'QUV')
(1 week)
4 hrs UV Exposure, 60 degrees C (UVA-340)
4 hrs Condensation, 50 degrees C
- 168 hr Cyclic Salt-Spray
Exposure (e.g. 'Prohesion')
(1 week)
1 hr Salt-Spray, 25 degrees C (using 0.35%
NH4(SO4)2, 0.05% NaCl electrolyte)
1 hr Dry-Off, 35 degrees C
|
| The above cycle is then typically repeated for a total of 3 - 6 cycles (i.e., 1008 - 2016 hrs of exposure)
|

Table 2
Correlation of Outdoor and Accelerated Testing
Correlation
Coefficients
|
|
Test Method |
SSPC data (1) |
CSCT data(2) |
|
|
|
|
ASTM B117 Salt Spray |
-0.110 |
-0.107 |
|
Cyclic Salt-Spray (w/ 5% NaCl) |
ND |
0.046 |
| KTA
Envirotest Type 1 |
0.485 |
ND |
| KTA
Envirotest Type 2 (w/UV) |
0.481 |
0.213 |
|
KTA Envirotest Type 3 |
-0.043 |
ND |
| KTA
Envirotest Type 4 (w/UV) |
0.619 |
ND |
|
Pohesion Test |
0.065 |
-0.091 |
|
ASTM D5894 Cyclic Salt-Fog/UV-Exposure |
0.699 |
0.459 |
|
|
|
|
ND = Not Determined |
|
|
The above data represents results
obtained in independent studies conducted by the
Society of Protective Coatings (SSPC) and the
Cleveland Society of Coatings Technology (CSCT).
In these studies the statistical correlation of
accelerated test results and outdoor exposure were
compared in the testing of a wide variety of water
and solvent based coatings, including alkyd, epoxy,
latex and polyurethane systems. Correlation
coefficients were averaged based on outdoor testing
conducted at 10 industrial and marine test sites
located throughout the U.S. and Canada.
References:
(1) Journal of Protective Coatings and Linings, Vol.
11, No. 10, 1994, p.51.
(2) Journal of Coatings Technology, Vol. 65, No.
837, 1994, p.49.
|

|